AI Governance and Compliance for your Company operating in the EU
YourAIsystemaffectspeople'srights.
TheEUrequiresyoutoprovehow.
We build the proof.
High-risk systems deadline · December 2, 2027
What We Deliver
AI Governance and Compliance for Your Company Operating in the EU
PILLAR 01
AI Compliance Audit
A written classification memo, a prioritised gap list, and a remediation roadmap — ready to present to your board or regulator. Delivered in 3 weeks.
"We don't know where we stand."
See what you get →
PILLAR 02
AI Ethics Advisory
A documented fairness record your legal team can stand behind — bias assessment, proportionality analysis, and ethics-by-design recommendations.
"We need to prove our AI is fair."
See what you get →
PILLAR 03
Grievance & Stakeholder Mechanisms
An operational complaint channel and stakeholder engagement plan for people affected by your AI — not a checkbox, a working process.
"We need a process for people affected by our AI."
See what you get →
PILLAR 04
FRIA Methodology
A scored, weighted Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment that withstands regulatory scrutiny. Delivered in 3 weeks. Revised at no charge if it doesn't meet Article 27 requirements.
"We need to file an FRIA before the deadline."
See what you get →
PILLAR 05
Third-Party AI Due Diligence
A structured assessment of your AI suppliers' compliance posture — contractual obligations, risk transfer, and EU AI Act exposure — before you deploy or renew.
"We're procuring an AI system and need to assess vendor risk."
See what you get →
PILLAR 06
Training
Bespoke workshops for compliance, legal, and technology teams on EU AI Act obligations, FRIA methodology, and governance frameworks. Delivered in-house or remotely.
"Our team needs to understand what the EU AI Act requires of us."
See what you get →
Regulatory Deadline
2027
December 2
High-risk AI systems under EU AI Act Annex III — including credit scoring, employment tools, education assessment, and public service automation — must comply from December 2, 2027. Fundamental Rights Impact Assessments are mandatory for deployers.
Non-compliance: fines up to EUR 35M or 7% of global annual turnover.
Understand Your Obligations →Methodology Paper
From Safeguards to Fundamental Rights: Applying IFC Proportionality Methodology to EU AI Act Article 27 Assessments
Article 27 mandates FRIA content but not methodology. Existing questionnaire-based approaches produce documentation without analytical rigor. This paper applies IFC PS1 proportionality methodology — developed over 30 years in development finance — to produce scored, weighted FRIA outputs that withstand regulatory scrutiny.
Get Started
Book a compliance assessment.
A one-hour scoping call to assess your AI system classification, documentation gaps, and FRIA obligations. No sales pitch.